Diversion — EJA128
KBFI · 14R2026-04-12 22:27 UTC· KLAX → KBFI· AIR NEMO LLC, AJS ORIOLE LLC, ERP BIOMEDICAL LLC, ESSEX HAWTHORN· GL5T
EJA128 (AIR Nemo) was operating from KLAX to KBFI (Boeing Field King County International Airport) on 2026-04-12. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Boeing Field King County International Airport (KBFI) on runway 14R at 22:27 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL404, turnaround area near Lassen, US. Approach stability score: 66/100. Scores in this band occur on roughly 10-15% of approaches at this runway, with multiple gates outside the per-runway envelope. METAR at the time reported 3 kt wind, 3 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY6/3475 2026-03-08 09:00Z – 2026-11-01 09:59Z SFC–180 ft
BEALE AFB, CA, Sunday, March 8, 2026 through Sunday, November 1, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/5797 2026-04-03 00:01Z – 2026-09-28 23:59Z SFC–400 ft
SACRAMENTO, CA, Thursday, April 2, 2026 through Monday, September 28, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 14R
- 21 ft AGL at event
- 120 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 66/100
- 3 kt wind
- 3 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- KBFI 221253Z VRB03KT 10SM OVC043 15/12 A3003 RMK AO2 SLP168 T01500117
Flight context
- EJA128
- AIR Nemo
- GL5T
- KLAX → KBFI
- 2026-04-12 22:27 UTC
- KBFI runway 14R
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data