Unstable approach — COBRA49

KEDW · 23L

2026-08-13 19:26 UTC· KEDW K9L2· T38

COBRA49 was operating from KEDW to K9L2 on 2026-08-13. SkyMeter detected a low approach-stability score at Edwards Air Force Base (KEDW) on runway 23L at 19:26 UTC. Trace data at the event: 3404 ft AGL, 210 kt GS. Approach stability score: 30/100. Scores below 50 occur on under 10% of approaches at this runway and indicate the v2 scorer flagged the approach as highly anomalous (three or more gates exceeded the runway's P90 envelope simultaneously). METAR at the time reported 7 kt wind, 1 kt crosswind component, 64,374 m visibility. The approach-stability score rates the final approach against stabilized-approach gates (glideslope, lateral deviation, descent rate, and IAS) at defined altitudes. A low score means one or more of those were outside the normal envelope for how the approach was flown. The score is graded by guidance type, so instrument approaches (ILS or an aligned straight-in) are held to the full gate set, while visual and pattern arrivals are surfaced only when the score is clearly low. The score is advisory and observational, a deviation measure, not an assertion of an accident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 23L
  • 3404 ft AGL at event
  • 210 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 30/100
  • 7 kt wind
  • 1 kt crosswind component
  • 64,374 m visibility
  • KEDW 161455Z 22012KT 40SM CLR 17/10 A2996 RMK AO2A SLP127 T01730104 52015

Flight context

  • COBRA49
  • T38
  • KEDW → K9L2
  • 2026-08-13 19:26 UTC
  • KEDW runway 23L

All events on this flight

Unstable approach 19:26:04 UTC · KEDW runway 23L · 3,404 ft AGL · 210 kt GS
Unstable approach 19:26:04 UTC · K9L2 runway 24 · 3,404 ft AGL · 210 kt GS

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KEDW