Long landing rollout — N506HG
KMDW · 31R2026-08-24 02:08 UTC· KDAL → KMDW· KIMBERLY-CLARK INTEGRATED SERVICES CORP· GLF5
N506HG (Kimberly-Clark Integrated Services) was operating from KDAL to KMDW on 2026-08-24. SkyMeter detected a long landing rollout at Chicago Midway International Airport (KMDW) on runway 31R at 02:08 UTC. Trace data at the event: 606 ft AGL, 10 kt GS. Approach stability score: 88/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 50% of approaches at this runway and represent the centerline of normal operations. METAR at the time reported 4 kt wind, 1 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. A long landing rollout is detected when ground deceleration after touchdown is below the per-runway P10 envelope. It is an observational measure of rollout efficiency, not a runway-exit incident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- UAS PUBLIC GATHERING6/2574 2026-08-13 12:00Z – 2026-08-24 05:00Z SFC–400 ft
des moines, IA, Thursday, August 13, 2026 through Monday, August 24, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 31R
- 606 ft AGL at event
- 10 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 88/100
- 4 kt wind
- 1 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- KMDW 161953Z 03004KT 10SM SCT017 BKN021 OVC120 22/19 A3029 RMK AO2 RAB18E43 SLP250 P0000 T02220189 $
Flight context
- N506HG
- Kimberly-Clark Integrated Services
- GLF5
- KDAL → KMDW
- 2026-08-24 02:08 UTC
- KMDW runway 31R
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data