Unstable approach — N200NW

KFCM · 10R

2026-06-07 23:40 UTC· K4R5 → KFCM· VIKING TRANSPORT LLC· BE20

N200NW (Viking Transport) was operating from K4R5 to KFCM on 2026-06-07. SkyMeter detected a low approach-stability score at Flying Cloud Airport (KFCM) on runway 10R at 23:40 UTC. Trace data at the event: 1983 ft AGL, 169 kt GS. Approach stability score: 58/100. Scores in this band occur on roughly 10-15% of approaches at this runway, with multiple gates outside the per-runway envelope. METAR at the time reported 8 kt wind, 3 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. The approach-stability score rates the final approach against stabilized-approach gates (glideslope, lateral deviation, descent rate, and IAS) at defined altitudes. A low score means one or more of those were outside the normal envelope for how the approach was flown. The score is graded by guidance type, so instrument approaches (ILS or an aligned straight-in) are held to the full gate set, while visual and pattern arrivals are surfaced only when the score is clearly low. The score is advisory and observational, a deviation measure, not an assertion of an accident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 10R
  • 1983 ft AGL at event
  • 169 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 58/100
  • 8 kt wind
  • 3 kt crosswind component
  • 16,093 m visibility
  • METAR KFCM 131753Z 27004KT 10SM OVC023 13/08 A2993 RMK AO2 SLP138 T01280078 10128 20111 53003

Flight context

  • N200NW
  • Viking Transport
  • BE20
  • K4R5 → KFCM
  • 2026-06-07 23:40 UTC
  • KFCM runway 10R

All events on this flight

Unstable approach 23:40:01 UTC · KFCM runway 10R · 1,983 ft AGL · 169 kt GS
Unstable approach 23:40:01 UTC · KFCM runway 10R · 1,983 ft AGL · 169 kt GS

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KFCM