None was inbound to KSKA on 2026-07-24. SkyMeter detected a go-around at Fairchild Air Force Base (KSKA) on runway 23 at 17:02 UTC. Trace data at the event: 3173 ft AGL, 163 kt GS. METAR at the time reported 7 kt wind, 5 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. A go-around is a discontinued landing approach in which the pilot adds power and climbs back to a safe altitude before re-attempting the approach or proceeding to an alternate. It is a routine safety response, not an emergency, and is taught as the standard reaction to any unstable approach. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- HAZARDS6/6682 2026-07-18 16:49Z – 2026-07-31 04:00Z SFC–11,500 ft
24NM E BAKER CITY, OR, Saturday, July 18, 2026 through Friday, July 31, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM → - HAZARDS6/6865 2026-07-20 14:00Z – 2026-08-04 04:00Z SFC–9,500 ft
20NM N ENTERPRISE, OR, Monday, July 20, 2026 through Tuesday, August 4, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM → - HAZARDS6/7243 2026-07-21 14:00Z – 2026-08-04 05:00Z SFC–9,500 ft
20NM N ENTERPRISE, OR, Tuesday, July 21, 2026 through Tuesday, August 4, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 23
- 3173 ft AGL at event
- 163 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- 7 kt wind
- 5 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- KSKA 150055Z 26007KT 10SM CLR 28/06 A2998 RMK AO2A SLP135 T02750057 $
Flight context
- None
- K35R
- 2026-07-24 17:02 UTC
- KSKA runway 23
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data