XAVCY was operating from KLAX to KHOU on 2026-03-13. SkyMeter detected a emergencydescent at 08:25 UTC. Trace data at the event: 26711 ft AGL, 449 kt GS. Approach stability score: 61/100. Scores in this band occur on roughly 10-15% of approaches at this runway, with multiple gates outside the per-runway envelope. METAR at the time reported 5 kt wind, 2 kt crosswind component. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY6/0091 2026-01-04 00:01Z – 2026-07-04 23:59Z SFC–500 ft
Coyote Wells, CA, Saturday, January 3, 2026 through Saturday, July 4, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/0092 2026-01-04 00:01Z – 2026-07-04 23:59Z SFC–500 ft
CALEXICO, CA, Saturday, January 3, 2026 through Saturday, July 4, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/4165 2026-02-14 07:00Z – 2026-08-15 06:59Z SFC–400 ft
Nogales, AZ, Saturday, February 14, 2026 through Friday, August 14, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/4160 2026-02-14 08:00Z – 2026-08-15 06:59Z SFC–400 ft
Chula Vista, CA, Saturday, February 14, 2026 through Friday, August 14, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/4240 2026-03-08 08:00Z – 2026-11-01 07:00Z SFC–180 ft
SAN ANGELO, TX, Sunday, March 8, 2026 through Sunday, November 1, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- 26711 ft AGL at event
- 449 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 61/100
- 5 kt wind
- 2 kt crosswind component
Flight context
- XAVCY
- LJ35
- KLAX → KHOU
- 2026-03-13 08:25 UTC
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data