Unstable approach — ERU97
KPRC · 302026-07-03 21:39 UTC· KP52 → KPRC· EMBRY RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC· DA42
ERU97 (Embry Riddle Aeronautical University) was operating from KP52 to KPRC on 2026-07-03. SkyMeter detected a low approach-stability score at Prescott Regional Airport - Ernest A. Love Field (KPRC) on runway 30 at 21:39 UTC. Trace data at the event: 5699 ft AGL, 101 kt GS. Approach stability score: 42/100. Scores below 50 occur on under 10% of approaches at this runway and indicate the v2 scorer flagged the approach as highly anomalous (three or more gates exceeded the runway's P90 envelope simultaneously). METAR at the time reported 14 kt wind, 14 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. The approach-stability score rates the final approach against stabilized-approach gates (glideslope, lateral deviation, descent rate, and IAS) at defined altitudes. A low score means one or more of those were outside the normal envelope for how the approach was flown. The score is graded by guidance type, so instrument approaches (ILS or an aligned straight-in) are held to the full gate set, while visual and pattern arrivals are surfaced only when the score is clearly low. The score is advisory and observational, a deviation measure, not an assertion of an accident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Pilot review data
- Runway 30
- 5699 ft AGL at event
- 101 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 42/100
- 14 kt wind
- 14 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- KPRC 162353Z AUTO 12009G21KT 10SM BKN095 BKN110 17/15 A3022 RMK AO2 PK WND 13030/2331 LTG DSNT N RAE46 SLP164 P0002 60010 T01670150 10272 20167 53001
Flight context
- ERU97
- Embry Riddle Aeronautical University
- DA42
- KP52 → KPRC
- 2026-07-03 21:39 UTC
- KPRC runway 30
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data