EmergencyDescent — ROU1605

2025-11-03 21:55 UTC· KFLL CYUL· Air Canada rouge LP (Air Canada rouge)· A321

ROU1605 (Air Canada Rouge LP (Air Canada Rouge)) was operating from KFLL to CYUL on 2025-11-03. SkyMeter detected a emergencydescent at 21:55 UTC. Trace data at the event: 32050 ft AGL, 493 kt GS. Approach stability score: 80/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 25% of approaches at this runway: one or more gates outside the per-runway tightest envelope, but still inside the typical operating range. METAR at the time reported 7 kt wind, 3 kt crosswind component. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Active FAA TFR during this flight

Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)
  • SECURITY5/2809 2025-10-20 12:00Z – 2026-10-20 12:00Z SFC–2,000 ft

    Palm Beach, FL, Monday, October 20, 2025 through Tuesday, October 20, 2026 Local

    View FAA NOTAM →
  • SECURITY5/2811 2025-10-20 12:00Z – 2026-10-20 12:00Z SFC–1,000 ft

    NEW YORK, NY, Monday, October 20, 2025 through Tuesday, October 20, 2026 Local

    View FAA NOTAM →

SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.

Pilot review data

  • 32050 ft AGL at event
  • 493 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 80/100
  • 7 kt wind
  • 3 kt crosswind component

Flight context

  • ROU1605
  • Air Canada Rouge LP (Air Canada Rouge)
  • A321
  • KFLL → CYUL
  • 2025-11-03 21:55 UTC

All events on this flight

EmergencyDescent 21:55:34 UTC · · 32,050 ft AGL · 493 kt GS
EmergencyDescent 21:55:34 UTC · · 32,050 ft AGL · 493 kt GS

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B