Long landing rollout — TWY321
KWVL · 052026-04-25 20:04 UTC· KRIC → KWVL· SNAILS PACE AVIATION LLC· F900
TWY321 (Snails Pace Aviation) was operating from KRIC to KWVL on 2026-04-25. SkyMeter detected a long landing rollout at Waterville Robert Lafleur Airport (KWVL) on runway 05 at 20:04 UTC. Trace data at the event: 311 ft AGL, 6 kt GS, 0 fpm vertical. Approach stability score: 77/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 25% of approaches at this runway: one or more gates outside the per-runway tightest envelope, but still inside the typical operating range. METAR at the time reported 7 kt wind, 16,093 m visibility. A long landing rollout is detected when ground deceleration after touchdown is below the per-runway P10 envelope. It is an observational measure of rollout efficiency, not a runway-exit incident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY5/2811 2025-10-20 12:00Z – 2026-10-20 12:00Z SFC–1,000 ft
NEW YORK, NY, Monday, October 20, 2025 through Tuesday, October 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 05
- 311 ft AGL at event
- 6 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 77/100
- 7 kt wind
- 0 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- METAR KWVL 211256Z AUTO VRB04KT 10SM CLR 11/09 A3011 RMK AO2 SLP203 T01110094
Flight context
- TWY321
- Snails Pace Aviation
- F900
- KRIC → KWVL
- 2026-04-25 20:04 UTC
- KWVL runway 05
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data